Resource

Id: TF_ChIP-seq/ENCSR784VUY
Type: position_score
Version: 0
Summary:
Description:
Labels:
  • reference_genome: hg38/genomes/GRCh38-hg38
  • accession: ENCSR784VUY
  • status: released
  • assay_term_name: ChIP-seq
  • simple_biosample_summary:
  • biosample_summary: Homo sapiens H1
  • replication_type: isogenic
  • biosample_ontology: /biosample-types/cell_line_EFO_0003042/
  • perturbed: False
  • doi: 10.17989/ENCSR784VUY
  • date_created: 2016-02-26T02:58:26.093581+00:00
  • date_released: 2016-12-06
  • submitter_comment: PJF:For the RNF2 antibody, is this the same one that the Snyder lab validated using IP and mass spec? Is the problem that it was validated for K562 and you have used it for hES? If so, I would be supportive of releasing that data with the statement that the antibody was characterized in K562 cells using an IP-western as a primary and mass spec as a secondary characterization.
  • target: RNF2

Scores

ID Type Default annotation Description Histogram Range
TF_ChIP-seq_ENCSR784VUY float

TF_ChIP-seq_ENCSR784VUY

TF_ChIP-seq ENCSR784VUY [biosample_summary="Homo sapiens H1" and target="RNF2"]
HISTOGRAM FOR TF_ChIP-seq_ENCSR784VUY [5.62, 182]

Files

Filename Size md5
ENCFF241UKW.bed.gz 186.27 KB a442594fbe5e05ebb545c857b8179c34
ENCFF241UKW.bed.gz.dvc 100.0 B 7e2cb4df3e461bbca6d05d5398b5f894
ENCFF241UKW.tabix.bed.gz 129.97 KB aa52ba0432653001823a477a24c44aa0
ENCFF241UKW.tabix.bed.gz.dvc 106.0 B 61c7d4968bcdd5d679f344d5043eb852
ENCFF241UKW.tabix.bed.gz.tbi 36.73 KB 47c0b0a2b06a99e19345af28856f42b9
ENCFF241UKW.tabix.bed.gz.tbi.dvc 109.0 B 3bcbaf431dd4a5ed11542155e3847a95
genomic_resource.yaml 5.14 KB 0a1a3ba976709d91eebdd01de3f081f3
genomic_resource_original.yaml 5.05 KB 7881321eb0d5e49dab837371e5231049
statistics/